Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the ci_theme domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home3/digitvdv/public_html/d-ciphersolution.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home3/digitvdv/public_html/d-ciphersolution.com/wp-includes/functions.php:6170) in /home3/digitvdv/public_html/d-ciphersolution.com/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
D-Cipher Solution. https://www.d-ciphersolution.com "Follow the Front Runner." Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:16:46 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/cropped-Capture-32x32.jpg D-Cipher Solution. https://www.d-ciphersolution.com 32 32 Criminal Investigation Is Just a Human Art. https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/2017/02/24/criminal-investigation-is-just-a-human-art/ https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/2017/02/24/criminal-investigation-is-just-a-human-art/#respond Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:16:46 +0000 http://www.d-ciphersolution.com/?p=339

The sad part of last week’s events in Yosemite was that it took one more killing than might have been to solve the multiple murders that had cast a pall over California’s most famous natural wonder.

Authorities had questioned their current suspect in the February killings, but they were not looking for a lone offender and there was no evidence that Cary Stayner was involved with potential co-offenders. Stayner also had no serious criminal history, a red flag for police in stranger violence. With little physical evidence to sort the innocent from the guilty, investigators must rely on their theories of how a crime happened to separate the high-priority suspects from the hundreds of possible offenders that any major investigation of a stranger-killing will generate. This time, the theory was wrong.

But was the Yosemite investigation bad luck or bad police work? It is both natural and necessary for experienced criminal investigators to adopt a working theory of how a killing occurred and to evaluate possible suspects and leads by measuring them against the official theory of the case. But constructing such probabilities is as much art as science, and last week’s lesson is that mistakes can be fatal.

How can it be that trial and error is still the best police practice in an age of DNA testing and supercomputers? Part of the answer to this question is the difference between a police investigation to identify unknown suspects and the use of physical evidence in criminal prosecution. The forensic laboratory is only occasionally successful in identifying a criminal suspect not already targeted. Sometimes a fingerprint on record will be the law’s first contact with the suspect. But DNA and tissue samples can only match a suspect when authorities have good biological samples from a crime scene and can get samples from potential suspects. And good lab work takes time and money in large measure.

At the front end of a criminal investigation, the traditional police methods of interrogation, tips and informers are much more important investigative tools than the microscope. And when a violent stranger crime occurs, police work is accurately summed up in that famous line from the movie “Casablanca”: “Round up the usual suspects.” Computers can help print out the list of usual suspects, but that is a supporting role.

The forensic laboratory comes into its own after a suspect has been identified and the question shifts to establishing or disproving guilt. DNA matches and blood evidence can be an important part of establishing guilt or innocence with a significant degree of science. Even here, however, there is a large range in the margin of error between the different branches of forensic science. Fiber analysis and handwriting analysis are far less exact than blood and fingerprints, even among the best practitioners. And the O.J. Simpson trial reminds us that sloppy lab work can deliver a crushing blow to the scientific rigor of any physical evidence-gathering process.

For the most part, good police work will remain methodical and low-tech work for the foreseeable future.

One old-fashioned lesson of the Yosemite murders is that authorities should never put total faith in any single theory of a crime. An open mind to how a crime may have happened is one important law enforcement tool.

Good police practice is not error-free detection; it is the ability to learn quickly from mistakes and not repeat them. One famous example of a dangerously exclusive law enforcement theory comes from the 1970s. The first time the U.S. Secret Service interviewed a suspect just before an assassination attempt on a president, the suspect was released because, being female, she did not fit the profile of an assassin. Shortly after that interview, Sara Jane Moore changed that profile for all time. And the very next dangerous attacker on a president, Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme, was also female.

Another lesson of the Yosemite killings is that humility also should be an important law enforcement tool. Supposing that the first three Yosemite murders were the work of more than one offender was wrong, but by no means was this mistake bad police work. Yet announcing that the killers were in custody when the evidence of guilt was quite weak is unprofessional in the extreme.

The problem in the Yosemite investigation was hubris rather than bad theory. The police had settled on suspects who had long police records, but there was little to tie those particular bad guys to the murders. The more confident the authorities are in the guilt of their current suspects, the less receptive they will be to follow alternative leads. When police round up the usual suspects in stranger-violence cases, they often will find the culprit, but not always. The best detectives also must keep a healthy respect for the unknown and the unpredictable.

Reference : |FRANKLIN E. ZIMRING | Franklin E. Zimring is law professor and director of the Earl Warren Legal Institute, UC Berkeley

]]>
https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/2017/02/24/criminal-investigation-is-just-a-human-art/feed/ 0
Investigation https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/slider/investigation-2/ Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:27:36 +0000 http://www.d-cipher.aapkaadsindia.com/?post_type=slider&p=246 Frauds https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/slider/frauds/ Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:26:53 +0000 http://www.d-cipher.aapkaadsindia.com/?post_type=slider&p=245 Insurance Frauds https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/slider/insurance-frauds/ Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:26:04 +0000 http://www.d-cipher.aapkaadsindia.com/?post_type=slider&p=244 IPR https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/slider/ipr/ Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:25:00 +0000 http://www.d-cipher.aapkaadsindia.com/?post_type=slider&p=243 Surveillance https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/slider/surveillance/ Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:24:14 +0000 http://www.d-cipher.aapkaadsindia.com/?post_type=slider&p=242 Process Service https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/slider/process-service/ Fri, 30 Dec 2016 07:23:09 +0000 http://www.d-cipher.aapkaadsindia.com/?post_type=slider&p=239 TRUTH IS NOT WHAT IT SEEMS, BUT WHAT IT IS !!! https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/2016/12/27/truth/ https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/2016/12/27/truth/#respond Tue, 27 Dec 2016 05:54:12 +0000 http://www.d-cipher.aapkaadsindia.com/?p=1 The Truth Is Not What It Seems, But What It Is

Dishonesty comes in many shapes and sizes. Of course, some people lie in error, in which they wholeheartedly believe their words when they’re spoken. Others tell bold-faced lies, knowing full well that they’re being deceitful. And still other people tell white lies, hoping to protect someone (often themselves) from the truth. Yet even though some of these folks may be well intentioned, it’s all lying just the same. How do you identify a lie? As a general rule of thumb, if your ears hear one thing and your eyes see another, use your brain — because something is obviously wrong. Here are some common forms of dishonesty that masquerade as acceptable behavior:

Misrepresentation. Distorting facts to consciously mislead or create a false impression. Spinning the truth, presenting opinion as fact, and using revisionist thinking or euphemisms to masquerade the truth are all forms of misrepresentation.

Omission. Leaving out key information to intentionally deceive someone. As Benjamin Franklin said, “Half the truth is often a great lie.”

Fabrication. Deliberately inventing an untruth or spreading a falsehood such as gossip or a rumor.

Exaggeration. Stretching the truth to give a more favorable impression.

Denial. Refusing to acknowledge the truth or to accept responsibility for a mistake or falsehood that was made.

Lack of transparency. Withholding information knowing that full disclosure will have negative consequences.

Redirection. Deflecting blame to another person to prevent personal embarrassment or responsibility.

False recognition. Stealing the credit for someone else’s hard-earned success.

Broken promise. Making a promise with no intention of keeping it.

Cover-up. Protecting the misdeeds of others. Those who provide cover for the misdeeds of others are as guilty as those who perpetrate the “crime.”

Hypocrisy. Saying one thing and consciously doing another. When words don’t match actions, someone is being dishonest with others or themselves.

Bait and switch. Attracting someone with an exciting offer only to divert them to an inferior deal.

Living a lie. Pretending that you are something you’re not.

Any way you cut it, when people distort the truth, they put their credibility at risk, while lowering their personal standards of honesty. Remember, BIG or small . . . a lie is a lie. Furthermore, a lie repeated many times doesn’t change the truth. Additionally, one or many believers don’t determine the truth or untruth. There’s no excuse for dishonesty. None. As someone once said, “The truth doesn’t cost anything, but a lie could cost you everything.”

Truth Be Told

The value of honesty cannot be overstated. Every time someone lies, alarm bells aren’t going to go off and that person’s nose isn’t going to get larger (like Pinocchio’s), but something definitely happens. The liar may suspect that the only reason the customer said, “yes” to his proposal, the only way she dodged the blame, and the only reason the recipient of the lie thought highly of him or her was due to the lie itself. The question remains: Even though they fooled someone else, how do liars feel about themselves? The obvious truth is that they thought they didn’t deserve the outcome or else they would have told the truth in the first place. They may explain away the lie by telling themselves that everybody does it or that the lie fell in a gray area. But I must ask you, is that any way to live your life?

When you stand for honesty, you believe in yourself and everything you represent. When you stand for honesty, everything you say carries the voice of credibility. But, when you’re dishonest, your soiled reputation will do the speaking for you.

There are several things you can do to demonstrate honesty:

  • Think before you speak.
  • Say what you mean and mean what you say.
  • Bend over backward to communicate in an open and honest fashion.
  • Simplify your statements so that everyone clearly understands your message.
  • Tell it like it is, rather than sugarcoating it.
  • Present both sides of each issue to engender objectivity.
  • If you have a personal bias or a conflict of interest, make it known.
  • Tell people the rationale behind your decisions so that your intent is understood.
  • If something is misinterpreted, quickly correct the record.
  • Don’t shoot the messenger when someone tells you the truth. Thank them for their honesty and treat the information provided as a gift.
  • Willingly accept responsibility by admitting a mistake or an error in judgment — in a timely fashion.
  • Hold people accountable when their words do not match their actions.
  • Never compromise your integrity and reputation by associating yourself with people whose standards of integrity you mistrust.

The truth shouldn’t be told only when it’s convenient. Honesty must be a way of life. Honesty means that you care deeply about trust, cherish your relationships, and value the importance of a solid reputation. Honesty means that you try to do your best and are willing to accept the consequences of your actions. Honesty means that you respect others enough to tell them the truth and that you value your opinion of yourself enough to never live a lie. As the saying goes, “It’s simple. Never lie to someone who trusts you, and never trust someone who lies to you.” That’s why it’s critical to always tell the truth — or the truth will tell on you. Honest.

]]>
https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/2016/12/27/truth/feed/ 0
Photo Gallery #1 https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/gallery/photo-gallery-1/ https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/gallery/photo-gallery-1/#respond Mon, 09 Dec 2013 13:02:14 +0000 http://www.cssigniter.com/preview/olympic/?post_type=gallery&p=97 https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/gallery/photo-gallery-1/feed/ 0 IPR https://www.d-ciphersolution.com/service/pilates/ Sat, 07 Dec 2013 23:02:52 +0000 http://www.cssigniter.com/preview/olympic/service/boxing-4/ UNDER-CONSTRUCTION

]]>